Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4, having a overall score of 82 against 81.9. IPhone XR's body is older, a bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 4. The iPhone XR has a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a lower number of cores and slower and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better display than iPhone XR, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 2280 resolution and a higher display density. Apple iPhone XR features as much memory to store more games and applications as the Google Pixel 4, both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity.
IPhone XR has a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5 percent greater battery size. The iPhone XR counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4, although it has a worse video quality, a back-facing camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution and a tinier aperture, they both have a same size camera sensor.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone XR, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.