Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel's general score of 80.2. Although Google Pixel 4 is heavier than the Google Pixel, it's just a bit thinner and notably newer. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel, because it has a bit larger display, a slightly better 1080 x 2280 resolution and a bit better pixels quantity per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 4 has a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 1 percent larger battery size. The Google Pixel has a camera that's just as good as the camera in Google Pixel 4, because although the Google Pixel has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, it also counts with a better resolution camera and a larger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a bit more than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.