Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4's general score of 81.9. Even though Google Pixel 2 XL is incredibly older and just a little heavier than the Google Pixel 4, it's design is still just a bit thinner. Google Pixel 4 features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution, a quite better pixels count per inch in the display and a bit bigger screen. The Google Pixel 2 XL's camera is just as good as the camera in Google Pixel 4, and although the Google Pixel 2 XL has a tinier back camera sensor capturing worse quality photographs and a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing images or videos in low light environments, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a 12.2 mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.