Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3, getting a overall score of 81.9 against 80. Google Pixel 4's design is newer than the Google Pixel 3's, although it's a little thicker and just a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a quite greater amount of pixels in each display inch, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a quite larger display. Google Pixel 3 has as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as the Google Pixel 4, they have equal 64 GB internal memory.
The Google Pixel 3 has a camera that is very similar to Google Pixel 4's camera, and although the Google Pixel 3 has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography, they both have the same video frame rates, the same sensor size, a 12.2 mega-pixels camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 2915mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.