Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-06-25 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Honor 50 Pro's score of 77. Although Google Pixel 4 is older and a little bit thicker than the Honor 50 Pro, it's design is still somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 4 features a little sharper screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count per display inch.
The Honor 50 Pro features a very superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better processing unit than Honor 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Honor 50 Pro features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Honor 50 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much better 108 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.