Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2024-03-22 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| OLED | LTPO |
| 443 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is better than the Google Pixel 4's overall score of 81.9. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's body is notably newer, but just a bit thicker and heavier than the Google Pixel 4. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a higher 1280 x 2800 resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a larger display. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 1 TB internal storage.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a way better camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has faster video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a way larger back camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 4, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.