Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 443 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 score. Google Pixel 4's design is incredibly newer and thinner than the HTC One M9's, although it is a little bit heavier. The HTC One M9 counts with a better screen than Google Pixel 4, although it has a little inferior pixels quantity per inch in the screen, a little bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a little bit smaller screen.
HTC One M9 counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits processor. HTC One M9 features just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 128 GB.
The HTC One M9 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the HTC One M9 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 20 MP resolution and a larger sensor.
The HTC One M9 counts with a battery life that is very similar to Google Pixel 4's battery lifetime, although the HTC One M9 also has a 1% larger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One M9. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, else you can save some money and buy the HTC One M9, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.