Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than LG G7 Fit, with a global score of 81.9 against 77. Although the Google Pixel 4 is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it is just a bit heavier and a bit thicker. Google Pixel 4 features just a little better performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The LG G7 Fit has a sharper display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a better pixel amount per screen inch, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a bit larger display. LG G7 Fit's camera is very similar to the Google Pixel 4 one, because although the LG G7 Fit has a tinier sensor and a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a way better 16 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
LG G7 Fit has much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG G7 Fit features just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.