Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-06-01 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than LG G7 ThinQ, having an 81.9 score against 81. Google Pixel 4's design has the same weight than the LG G7 ThinQ, but it's a little thicker. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a brighter display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and more pixels per inch of screen.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG G7 ThinQ features a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a much more megapixels back-facing camera, faster video frame rates and a larger camera aperture to take better images and video in low light situations.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G7 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG G7 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the LG G7 ThinQ, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.