Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than LG K52, getting a score of 81.9 against 76. The Google Pixel 4 is an older device than LG K52, but it is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 4 has a much better screen than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better number of pixels per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2280.
LG K52 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG K52 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 has just a little better hardware performance than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG K52 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the LG K52 also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
LG K52 has a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.