Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a score of 85.4, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4's 81.9 general score. LG K92 is a newer phone than Google Pixel 4, although it is just a bit thicker and much heavier. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2280px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better CPU than LG K92. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 6 GB RAM memory. The LG K92 takes greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the LG K92 also counts with a much larger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality and a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The LG K92 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. LG K92 has a superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG K92 costs more than Google Pixel 4, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.