Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than LG Stylo 6, having a general score of 81.9 against 76.7. Google Pixel 4 is a just a little thinner and way lighter cellphone than LG Stylo 6, although both of them were released only 7 months apart. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit sharper screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a little higher display pixels density.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG Stylo 6 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little faster processor than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory.
The LG Stylo 6 has a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Google Pixel 4 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a camera with lesser megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor, a bigger aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 is way more expensive than LG Stylo 6, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.