Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4, getting a score of 82.5 against 81.9. LG V30S ThinQ is an older cellphone than the Google Pixel 4, but it is just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit superior CPU than LG V30S ThinQ. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a just a little better number of pixels per inch of screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a bit larger display. LG V30S ThinQ has a much greater memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ features greater battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 4, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.