Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting an 81.9 score against 81.3. Google Pixel 4's construction is newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, although it is just a bit thicker and a little heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ and Google Pixel 4 feature incredibly similar CPUs, they have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, a little bit bigger display and a just a bit higher pixels quantity per screen inch. LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ shoots clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations.
The LG V35 ThinQ has superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.