Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting an 81.9 score against 81.2. Google Pixel 4's body is newer and a little bit lighter than the LG V40 ThinQ's, but it's just a bit thicker. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a processor that's very similar to Google Pixel 4's CPU, both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a little bit greater count of pixels in each inch of display and a quite bigger display. LG V40 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution camera, a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ has superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V40 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the LG V40 ThinQ, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.