Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4's score of 81.9. Although it's the best device we compare here, LG V60 ThinQ's body is extremely heavier and just a bit thicker than Google Pixel 4. LG V60 ThinQ features a CPU that is just as good as the Google Pixel 4 one, and although the LG V60 ThinQ has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 4 features a bit sharper screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels in each screen inch. LG V60 ThinQ takes a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back, a lot better video quality and a lot bigger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The LG V60 ThinQ features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79 percent greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, LG V60 ThinQ is also a bit cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.