Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4, getting an 87.1 score against 81.9. The LG Velvet body is somewhat heavier but just a bit thinner than the Google Pixel 4, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better amount of pixels per display inch.
The LG Velvet counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 4 counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG Velvet. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
The LG Velvet counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh. LG Velvet has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also counts with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs.
LG Velvet is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.