Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than Google Pixel 4, with a global score of 91.2 against 81.9. LG Wing's body is newer than Google Pixel 4's, although it's notably heavier and notably thicker. Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better looking display than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels in each inch of screen.
The LG Wing features a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 4 features just a little better performance than LG Wing, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
LG Wing counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG Wing also counts with better video frame rate, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The LG Wing counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG Wing, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.