Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-09-10 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Glacier |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Microsoft Surface Duo's score of 78.8. Google Pixel 4 is an older and way thicker phone than the Microsoft Surface Duo, but Google was able to build it much lighter anyway. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid display than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels in each display inch.
The Microsoft Surface Duo counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Microsoft Surface Duo's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Google Pixel 4, they have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 4 has a slightly better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a better resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture for better images in low-light situations.
The Microsoft Surface Duo counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3577mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.