Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-09-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a global score of 85.3, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4's overall score of 81.9. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 construction is newer and noticeably thinner, but also much heavier than the Google Pixel 4. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little bit lower pixels amount in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot bigger display and a lot higher resolution of 1892 x 2688.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's CPU is very similar to Google Pixel 4's processor, and although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, although it has a worse video resolution and a less mega-pixels back camera, they both have a same size diafragm aperture. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 4, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.