Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with an 81.9 score against 78.5. The Google Pixel 4 construction is just a bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but it is just a bit thicker and was released 3 years before. Google Pixel 4 counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little worse pixels quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.