Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4's 81.9 general score. Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a newer phone than the Google Pixel 4, but it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Google Pixel 4 has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 64 percent more battery size.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a much higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.