Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than Google Pixel 4, having an 86.3 score against 81.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro body has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 4, but it's somewhat heavier. Google Pixel 4 counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better looking display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 61 percent greater battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures, a larger aperture and a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.