Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LTPS |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Moto G 5G's global score of 81.5. Google Pixel 4's design is incredibly lighter and thinner than the Moto G 5G, although it was released a bit more more than a year before. The Google Pixel 4 has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density. Moto G 5G captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Moto G 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The Moto G 5G features a much greater memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto G 5G also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola Moto G 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.