Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a bit better than Google Pixel 4, getting a score of 82.6 against 81.9. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's construction is much heavier and just a little thicker than Google Pixel 4. The Google Pixel 4 has a little sharper display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2280px resolution, it also counts with a bit higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
Google Pixel 4 has just a little better performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G Plus has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a much bigger sensor and a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.