Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than Moto G Power, with an 81.9 score against 76.1. Google Pixel 4's construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Moto G Power, although both of them were released only 6 months apart. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2280px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel number per inch in the display.
The Motorola Moto G Power has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 4 has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
Moto G Power features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G Power also counts with a way higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79 percent bigger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola Moto G Power, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.