Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-04-27 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Moto G60's score of 79.5. Even though Google Pixel 4 is older than Moto G60, it's construction is thinner and noticeably lighter. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G60, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels amount per inch of screen.
Moto G60 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G60 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better performance than Moto G60, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto G60 takes a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G60 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 108 MP resolution.
Motorola Moto G60 has a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 114% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.