Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, having an 81.9 score against 76. The Google Pixel 4 body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto G8 Power, although both of them were only released 6 months apart. Google Pixel 4 features a slightly better looking screen than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better display density.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power features a superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 4 counts with just a little better performance than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Motorola Moto G8 Power takes just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same video quality and a F1.7 camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also counts with a much better resolution back camera.
Google Pixel 4 costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G8 Power, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.