Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-09-07 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Moto G9 Plus's 80.5 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 is an older device than Moto G9 Plus, but it is much lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus has a much better storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto G9 Plus counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Moto G9 Plus counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto G9 Plus also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.