Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting an 81.9 score against 76.4. Although the Google Pixel 4 is thicker than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's just a bit lighter and noticeably newer. Google Pixel 4 has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 21 MP resolution.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has superior battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.