Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a global score of 81.9 against 77.4. Google Pixel 4's body is much newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Play's, but it's much thicker and somewhat heavier. Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 has a bit sharper screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a quite larger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a just a little higher display density. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4 also has a back camera with more mega pixels. The Moto Z2 Play counts with just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z2 Play, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.