Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than Moto Z3, with a global score of 81.9 against 77.6. Google Pixel 4's body is newer than Moto Z3's, although it's thicker and a little bit heavier. Google Pixel 4 has a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2280 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 4 features a bit superior processor than Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 4 also has a more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low light environments.
Motorola Moto Z3 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z3 features just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 costs a bit more money than Motorola Moto Z3, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.