Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than Moto Z3 Play, having an 81.9 score against 76.3. The Google Pixel 4 body is newer than the Moto Z3 Play's, although it is just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Google Pixel 4 features a bit better performance than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a just a bit more pixels per display inch. The Moto Z3 Play features a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z3 Play also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Moto Z3 Play has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 4 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same diafragm aperture, the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4 also has a more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Google Pixel 4 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.