Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | LTPS |
| 443 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace, getting a global score of 81.9 against 81.6. Google Pixel 4 is an older phone than the Motorola One 5G Ace, but Google managed to make it much lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit superior CPU than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better looking display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better amount of pixels in each inch of screen. The Motorola One 5G Ace takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a F1.7 aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola One 5G Ace features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.