Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than the Motorola One Action, with an 81.9 score against 78.5. Google Pixel 4's construction is just a bit lighter and thinner than Motorola One Action, even when both were only released 2 months apart. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
Google Pixel 4 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola One Action counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal memory.
Google Pixel 4 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4 also has a bigger camera aperture and a higher 12.2 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola One Action features better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Google Pixel 4 is a bit more expensive than Motorola One Action, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.