Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, getting an 81.9 score against 79.8. Google Pixel 4's construction is lighter and just a bit thinner than the Motorola One Hyper, although they were released with only 1 months difference. Google Pixel 4 has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels count per display inch.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot better 64 MP resolution camera.
The Motorola One Hyper has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 4 is also cheaper than the Motorola One Hyper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.