Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Motorola One Vision, with a overall score of 81.9 against 80.7. Even when the Google Pixel 4 and the Motorola One Vision were released with only 5 months difference, the Google Pixel 4 is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola One Vision features a better camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola One Vision also has a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos and a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Motorola One Vision counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola One Vision features longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.