Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, getting a general score of 81.9 against 80. Even though Google Pixel 4 and the Motorola One Zoom were released only 2 months apart, Google Pixel 4 is lighter and a little thinner. Google Pixel 4 features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 features a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. Motorola One Zoom shoots better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 128 GB. Motorola One Zoom features a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 4 is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.