Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than Google Pixel 4, getting an 87 score against 81.9. Even though Motorola razr (2020) is somewhat heavier than Google Pixel 4, it's a little thinner and also newer. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density and a little higher 1080 x 2280 resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way more megapixels back camera and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Google Pixel 4 one.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 4. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 4, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.