Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting an 81.9 score against 75.8. Google Pixel 4's body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even when both were only released with a few months difference. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh. The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a back camera with lot more megapixels, a much bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a lot better video resolution.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 4 is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.