Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's general score of 76.2. Even though the Google Pixel 4 is older than nubia Red Magic 5S, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a processor that's very similar to the Google Pixel 4 one, and although the nubia Red Magic 5S has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera with way more mega pixels and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4 is also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.