Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | -- |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is just a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting a general score of 81.9 against 77. The Google Pixel 4 body is a little bit thicker but just a bit lighter than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit better screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a bit worse pixel amount in each display inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger screen.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a much better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 has a much better battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.