Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 construction is lighter and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a way better processing power than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A15 5G features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A15 5G shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a much more MP back camera.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A15 5G. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A15 5G, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.