Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 443 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a bit better than the Galaxy A20s, getting a score of 81.9 against 77. Although the Google Pixel 4 and Galaxy A20s were only released with a couple of months difference, the Google Pixel 4 construction is somewhat lighter but also a little thicker than Galaxy A20s. The Google Pixel 4 features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a lot better screen density.
The Galaxy A20s counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A20s also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A20s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor, a bigger aperture and a much higher video resolution. The Galaxy A20s counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.