Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-06-29 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A21's score of 76.1. Google Pixel 4 is a lighter cellphone than Galaxy A21, but both are 0.32inches thick. Google Pixel 4 has a sharper display than Galaxy A21, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a way greater display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A21 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A21 has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A21, because although it has a way less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a larger back camera sensor.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A21. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy A21, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.