Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A22's overall score of 76.1. The Google Pixel 4 is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A22, but Google made it just a little thinner and lighter. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a lot more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A22 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A22 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Google Pixel 4 has a bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a much better video definition. Google Pixel 4 counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.