Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 443 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than Google Pixel 4, getting a global score of 84.6 against 81.9. Galaxy A22 5G's body is newer than Google Pixel 4's, but it is just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier. Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater number of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A22 5G has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a lot higher resolution camera. The Galaxy A22 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.