Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, with a score of 81.9 against 79.9. Although Google Pixel 4 is extremely older than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy A25 5G has a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little worse pixel number per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Google Pixel 4 features a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A25 5G features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy A25 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture and a tinier sensor, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.