Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A30s's global score of 79.8. Even though Google Pixel 4 and Galaxy A30s were only released with a couple of months difference, the Google Pixel 4 body is just a little lighter but also a little thicker than Galaxy A30s.
Google Pixel 4 features a better display than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a lot higher number of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A30s has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A30s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A30s has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a much less megapixels back facing camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.