Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 339.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Galaxy A31, getting an 81.9 score against 81.3. Google Pixel 4 is a somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner phone than the Galaxy A31, even when they were only released with a couple of months difference. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a little higher pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A31 has much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a much larger sensor and a camera in the back with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A31 features a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.